Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2018. It is now read-only.

Try to give the fweiler/[1-2] branches more meaningful names #13

Open
brevilo opened this issue Dec 6, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Try to give the fweiler/[1-2] branches more meaningful names #13

brevilo opened this issue Dec 6, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@brevilo
Copy link

brevilo commented Dec 6, 2012

1-2 is somewhat meaningless. If we preserve them we should be able to tell why and hence be able to label them more appropriately I think.

@romw
Copy link
Member

romw commented Dec 11, 2012

Patches welcome.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants