You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hello, in some projects I create an ad-hoc environment with conda or venv, while on the most basic ones I use the default Python environment, for simplicity. I think this scenario is not unique.
My proposal would be to allow for the linter-pylint.executable variable to be a comma-separated list of alternatives: the user could specify a per-project pylint path by using the %p syntax, and a fallback e.g. to /usr/local/bin/pylint if the first is not found.
Does this seem reasonable? I can try to put together a PR if there is agreement and interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
corradomonti
changed the title
Feature request: allow fallbacks for pylint executable path
Feature request: allow fallbacks for pylint executable path
Jun 13, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello, in some projects I create an ad-hoc environment with
conda
orvenv
, while on the most basic ones I use the default Python environment, for simplicity. I think this scenario is not unique.My proposal would be to allow for the
linter-pylint.executable
variable to be a comma-separated list of alternatives: the user could specify a per-projectpylint
path by using the%p
syntax, and a fallback e.g. to/usr/local/bin/pylint
if the first is not found.Does this seem reasonable? I can try to put together a PR if there is agreement and interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: